Bermudan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,114,545 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.938. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.335% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 335.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $106,888, a difference of 21.1%), per capita income ($42,911 compared to $51,770, a difference of 20.6%), and median family income ($97,577 compared to $116,165, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $43,571, a difference of 10.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $66,376, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $54,352, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.8%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (62.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.90%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.3%).