English vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,437,009 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within English communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in English within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 English corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,982 compared to $51,770, a difference of 17.7%), median female earnings ($38,196 compared to $43,571, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,429 compared to $106,888, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,805 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,487 compared to $66,376, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.4%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.2%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 81.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.1%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.38%), ged/equivalency (87.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between English and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.9%).