Slavic vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,329,270 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.959. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.752% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 751.6 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $51,770, a difference of 14.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $106,888, a difference of 10.9%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $116,165, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.61%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $66,376, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.19%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.5%).