Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Cuba
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Cuba

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Fair
Excellent
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,435,269 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $116,165, a difference of 48.5%), householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $66,376, a difference of 48.4%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $51,770, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $43,571, a difference of 30.9%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$34,910
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Tragic
$78,249
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Tragic
$68,461
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,426
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$43,461
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,291
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,374
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,701
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,662
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$44,735
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 115.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 79.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.1%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.2%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 46.0%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (68.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 100.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 70.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.5%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.78%).
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CubaImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%