Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Poor
Excellent
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,580,402 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.1%), per capita income ($41,655 compared to $51,770, a difference of 24.3%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $116,165, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $43,571, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $52,361, a difference of 14.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.7%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.0%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
28.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 101.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 35.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.61%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%