Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Fair
Excellent
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,240,268 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 7.2 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $51,770, a difference of 22.4%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $62,217, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $106,888, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $66,376, a difference of 10.2%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.5%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%