Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,703,293 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $51,770, a difference of 36.7%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $62,217, a difference of 26.5%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $116,165, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $54,352, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $66,376, a difference of 17.0%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 42.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.6%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.1%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 79.4%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Tragic 11.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |