Immigrants from El Salvador vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,321,477 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 44.3 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,913 compared to $101,960, a difference of 17.3%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $56,136, a difference of 17.0%), and median family income ($92,545 compared to $108,234, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $55,470, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $64,201, a difference of 10.3%), and median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $40,496, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (67.0% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.9%), no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).