Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,676,054 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.866% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 866.1 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $108,270, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($106,252 compared to $108,234, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $40,496, a difference of 0.15%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $64,201, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $55,470, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.16%), family households (67.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.44%).