Immigrants from Latin America vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,794,059 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 20.6 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $108,234, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $108,270, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $101,960, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $55,470, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $40,496, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 47.5%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.5%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 28.4%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (67.2% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.2%), master's degree (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.2%).