Immigrants from Central America vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,110,433 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 22.7 Sri Lankans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $101,960, a difference of 27.4%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $108,234, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $108,270, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $55,470, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $40,496, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.5%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 43.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.6%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 0.84%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.35, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.51%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.6%).