Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Serbians

Fair
Excellent
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,963,633 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 10.5 Serbians.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Serbian Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $46,551, a difference of 23.0%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $57,975, a difference of 17.9%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,106, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $61,087, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $40,539, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.3%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Good
30.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosSerbian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%