Chickasaw vs Serbian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Serbian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Serbians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Serbian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,355,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 88.4 Serbians.
Chickasaw vs Serbian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,551, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $98,320, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,522, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,087, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,106, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,551 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $107,157 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $87,572 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,677 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,975 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Excellent $40,539 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,106 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $98,320 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,522 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $61,087 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.98%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 30.7% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.1%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Serbian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Serbian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |