Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 488,117,564 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 23.4 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,541 compared to $59,197, a difference of 54.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $69,234, a difference of 53.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $65,996, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $31,560, a difference of 28.5%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 32.5%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $35,560, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 148.3%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 138.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 134.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 64.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 67.8%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 76.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 68.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 50.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.4%), family households (67.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 80.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 74.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 47.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.1%), no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 5th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3rd grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 19.4%).