Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,628,570 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.207% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 206.9 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($108,161 compared to $70,423, a difference of 53.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $69,234, a difference of 52.3%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $59,197, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $31,560, a difference of 33.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $39,726, a difference of 33.9%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 142.5%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 136.2%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 131.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 51.5%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 59.1%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 70.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 77.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 72.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 54.8%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.0%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 92.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 56.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.3%).