Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,969,413 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 83.3 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $42,550, a difference of 34.2%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $70,423, a difference of 34.2%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $59,197, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $31,560, a difference of 20.5%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $39,726, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 109.8%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 101.7%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 93.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 38.2%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 84.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 83.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 38.9%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.38%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 48.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 77.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.5%).