Immigrants from Pakistan vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,206,764 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Pakistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Pakistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.144% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Pakistan corresponds to a decrease of 143.7 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,434 compared to $69,234, a difference of 65.3%), median household income ($97,528 compared to $59,197, a difference of 64.7%), and median family income ($114,406 compared to $70,423, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,052 compared to $31,560, a difference of 36.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,789 compared to $39,726, a difference of 42.9%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 44.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 159.2%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 153.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 149.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 71.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and single female poverty (18.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 85.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 77.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 74.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 68.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 46.6%), and divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.66%), family households (67.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (30.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.8%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 103.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 67.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 13.8%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 35.3%).