Immigrants from Switzerland vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,612,929 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Switzerland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Switzerland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.262% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Switzerland corresponds to a decrease of 262.2 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,866 compared to $31,268, a difference of 75.5%), median family income ($120,726 compared to $70,423, a difference of 71.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,934 compared to $69,234, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,528 compared to $39,726, a difference of 34.7%), median female earnings ($43,996 compared to $31,560, a difference of 39.4%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 47.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 175.5%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 167.7%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 152.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 57.2%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 70.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 85.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 75.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 64.6%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 59.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (61.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.28, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 120.7%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 118.3%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 89.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 11.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 16.7%).