Native/Alaskan vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,974,380 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $74,815, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $44,733, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($33,279 compared to $35,102, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($80,908 compared to $80,885, a difference of 0.030%), median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $45,094, a difference of 0.71%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $34,074, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.7%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty among girls under 16 (24.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty (19.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.6%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 0.35%), currently married (42.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.6%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.2%).