Lithuanian vs Kiowa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Kiowa

Excellent
Poor
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Kiowa Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,336,491 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.089% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 89.2 Kiowa.
Lithuanian Integration in Kiowa Communities

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $74,815, a difference of 50.3%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $80,885, a difference of 42.7%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $65,914, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $44,733, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $34,074, a difference of 23.6%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Income
Income MetricLithuanianKiowa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$35,102
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$80,885
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$65,914
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$39,232
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$45,094
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$34,074
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$44,733
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$74,776
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$74,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Tragic
$51,140
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
23.6%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 70.9%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 70.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 30.0%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianKiowa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
29.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
22.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.9%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianKiowa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianKiowa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
62.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
78.3%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.4%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianKiowa
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
43.1%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 36.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianKiowa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.2%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 63.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianKiowa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
57.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Lithuanian vs Kiowa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 60.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.2%).
Lithuanian vs Kiowa Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianKiowa
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
17.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
32.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
54.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%