Norwegian vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,845,347 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $74,815, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $80,885, a difference of 31.2%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $65,914, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $34,074, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $44,733, a difference of 18.8%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $39,232, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 79.0%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 77.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 47.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (63.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.27, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 79.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.9%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 51.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.6%).