Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,518,213 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $74,815, a difference of 41.8%), median household income ($91,541 compared to $65,914, a difference of 38.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $74,776, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $34,074, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($47,671 compared to $39,232, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 64.3%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 42.1%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 75.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.48%), high school diploma (87.2% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and ged/equivalency (84.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.0%).