Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,486,485 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $74,815, a difference of 22.0%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $65,914, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($93,593 compared to $80,885, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $44,733, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $45,094, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 44.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 43.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 23.4%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.0% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.40%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.80%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.8%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.0% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 11th grade (91.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 15.1%).