Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,166,879 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 14.8 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,263 compared to $103,534, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $103,173, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $54,695, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $56,384, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $39,871, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.1%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 61.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.6%).