Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,747,232 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $61,988, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $103,534, a difference of 32.3%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $89,010, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $56,384, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $39,871, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 72.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 30.3%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.4%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%).