Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,163,472 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 48.5 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $97,329, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($93,933 compared to $89,010, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $54,695, a difference of 0.48%), householder income under 25 years ($57,074 compared to $56,384, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($42,694 compared to $43,852, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.1%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (46.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.7%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.5%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.7%).