Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,816,406 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 40.0 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $43,852, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $61,988, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $39,871, a difference of 2.7%), median earnings ($45,090 compared to $47,025, a difference of 4.3%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $54,695, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.78%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.4%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.31, a difference of 0.59%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.1%).