French American Indian vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,831,057 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.842. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.169% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 169.0 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,387 compared to $89,010, a difference of 16.5%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $56,384, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $103,173, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.99%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $39,871, a difference of 8.0%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $54,695, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.0%), single male poverty (15.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 15.0%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.31, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.9%).