Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Peru Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,359,275 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.050% in Immigrants from Peru. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 50.0 Immigrants from Peru.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $56,384, a difference of 7.7%), per capita income ($45,043 compared to $43,852, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $103,534, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $61,988, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $103,173, a difference of 0.40%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and male poverty (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.70%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.6%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Peru communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.22%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.78%).