Immigrants from India vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,727,784 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from India communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from India within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from India corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,207 compared to $57,145, a difference of 29.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($124,238 compared to $97,185, a difference of 27.8%), and median household income ($113,009 compared to $89,412, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($72,804 compared to $63,041, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($59,914 compared to $51,370, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($48,292 compared to $40,977, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (10.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 45.4%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%), single mother poverty (23.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (31.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.55%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.1%), master's degree (22.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from India and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.3%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and ambulatory disability (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.4%).