Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,771,119 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 39.3 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $106,164, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $89,412, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,043 compared to $45,066, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $40,977, a difference of 0.59%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $48,673, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.72%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.57%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.3%).