Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,625,384 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.652. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,370, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $57,145, a difference of 2.6%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,220 compared to $45,066, a difference of 0.34%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $89,412, a difference of 0.35%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $97,185, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.5%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%).