Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,700,311 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($97,958 compared to $107,715, a difference of 10.0%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $45,066, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,370, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $97,185, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $40,977, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.4%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.45%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 54.0%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%).