Crow vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,950,660 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.918. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.326% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 326.3 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,627, a difference of 56.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $108,264, a difference of 45.8%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $92,417, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,209, a difference of 15.3%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,554, a difference of 17.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $49,841, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 101.6%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 95.5%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.7%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 258.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 219.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 216.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 86.4%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 56.9%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%).