Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,610,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $49,627, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $63,885, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $59,491, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $54,209, a difference of 0.51%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $41,554, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.060%), male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.26%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.9%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and college, 1 year or more (61.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%).