Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,052,359 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 26.2 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.8%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $49,627, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $59,491, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $41,554, a difference of 0.25%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $108,264, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,795 compared to $63,885, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.44%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.7%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.6%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 68.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.0%).