Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,506,596 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $63,885, a difference of 42.8%), per capita income ($34,910 compared to $49,627, a difference of 42.2%), and median family income ($78,249 compared to $110,873, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,209, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $41,554, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 86.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 37.6%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (68.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.1%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 65.4%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.8%).