Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Argentina
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Argentina
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,699
SOCIAL INDEX
74.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
107th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Argentina Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,410,147 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.691% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 691.3 Immigrants from Argentina.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,627, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $92,417, a difference of 32.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,264, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,885, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,554, a difference of 20.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,627 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $110,873 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $92,417 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,841 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $59,491 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,554 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,209 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $101,415 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $108,264 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,885 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.9%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.70%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Argentina Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 72.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Argentina |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |