French American Indian vs Immigrants from Argentina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,883,817 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Argentina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 33.9 Immigrants from Argentina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $49,627, a difference of 23.3%), median household income ($76,387 compared to $92,417, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $108,264, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $54,209, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $41,554, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 21.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 21.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.6%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 41.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Argentina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.3%).