Crow vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,861,200 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 50.0%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $43,461, a difference of 37.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $99,904, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,173, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,827, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $45,940, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 129.8%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 108.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 89.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.9%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 249.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 234.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 228.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.3%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.84%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.2%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.56%), 7th grade (99.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and 8th grade (99.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).