Blackfeet vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,161,186 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 16.3 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $94,610, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $102,676, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $99,904, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $38,173, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,827, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $45,940, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.2%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.7%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.9%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.09, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.0%).