Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,589,853 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $43,461, a difference of 13.5%), median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $38,173, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($51,624 compared to $45,940, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $59,535, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $51,827, a difference of 7.2%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.74%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 77.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%).