Chickasaw vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,461,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 50.1 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,896, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,621, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,193, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,283, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,732, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.4%).