Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Salvadoran
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Salvadorans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,588
SOCIAL INDEX
23.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
250th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Salvadoran Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,979,400 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Salvadorans.
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,412, a difference of 23.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,449, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,646, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,912, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,858, a difference of 6.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,858 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $94,109 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,449 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,912 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,646 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,083 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,412 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,198 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $94,842 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,141 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.89%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.0%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.48, a difference of 9.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.48 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.0% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 121.0%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 91.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 90.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 89.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 87.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 86.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 84.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 78.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Salvadoran |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |