Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Haiti
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Haiti
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,401
SOCIAL INDEX
11.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
310th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Haiti Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,858,027 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 74.4 Immigrants from Haiti.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,398, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $45,266, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,550, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,849, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,257, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $36,849 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $84,018 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $72,599 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $40,550 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $45,266 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,203 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,398 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $79,391 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $83,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $51,219 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.9%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.39 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 95.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 46.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.31%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 56.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Haiti |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |