Chickasaw vs American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Americans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,435
SOCIAL INDEX
31.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
220th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
American Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,682,212 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 104.6 Americans.
Chickasaw vs American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $90,536, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,860, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,791, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,527, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,777, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,039 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $92,096 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,932 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,742 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,761 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,777 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,860 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,791 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $90,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $55,527 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.8% |
Chickasaw vs American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.6%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
Chickasaw vs American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.86%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.4% |
Chickasaw vs American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | American |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Chickasaw vs American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | American |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | American |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |