Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Chile
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Chile
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,221,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 183.9 Immigrants from Chile.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,213, a difference of 26.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,388, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,412, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,354, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,954, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,213 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $105,655 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $88,388 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,697 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $55,954 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,353 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,440 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,159 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,412 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,354 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Average 25.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 8.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 31.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Poor 54.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Average 85.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Chile |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |