Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Vietnam
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Vietnam

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,880
SOCIAL INDEX
66.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
138th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Vietnam Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,615,889 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 42.5 Immigrants from Vietnam.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Vietnam Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,987, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,417, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $100,535, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,913, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $47,282, a difference of 16.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Fair
$43,229
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Excellent
$106,186
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$91,987
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Good
$47,282
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Good
$54,913
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Good
$40,153
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$55,562
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$100,535
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$106,417
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Excellent
$63,014
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Good
25.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 24.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
68.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
29.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
60.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 96.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
88.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Poor
64.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Poor
58.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 58.7%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 57.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Vietnam Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Vietnam
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%