Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Caribbean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Caribbean
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
956
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
332nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,694,533 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 24.6 Immigrants from Caribbean.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 33.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,757, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $48,535, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,513, a difference of 0.39%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,119, a difference of 1.1%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,254, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,254 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $83,319 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $71,860 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,119 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,193 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,757 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,326 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $82,513 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $48,535 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 56.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 16.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 19.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.33 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 39.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 149.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 67.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 52.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 80.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 44.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 71.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 56.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 51.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Caribbean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Caribbean |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |