Chickasaw vs Australian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Australian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Australians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,058
SOCIAL INDEX
88.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
32nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Australian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,000,331 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Australians.
Chickasaw vs Australian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $52,074, a difference of 42.8%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $118,440, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $107,912, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,739, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,891, a difference of 24.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $52,074 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $118,440 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $96,490 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $52,294 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $62,857 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,308 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,739 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $107,912 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $113,533 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $66,891 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.8%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Excellent 20.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 70.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Australian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Australian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |